• ChesReport (current)
  • Marine Invasions Lab
  • Partner Portals
    Nemesis California Panama Galapagos Cocos Island NP JTMD
    Archived Projects
    Chesapeake
  • Browse Species
    Taxonomic Groups All Species
  • News
  • login
You are viewing an archived site. The Chesapeake Bay Introduced Species Database project ended in 2020 and the database is no longer receiving updates. Learn more…
Image of Potamogeton crispus

Potamogeton crispus

Plants

Curly Pondweed

Image Credit: U.S. Agricultural Research Service 1971

Description Taxonomy Invasion History Ecology Impacts References

Description

Potamogeton crispus is a submersed plant (submersed aquatic vegetation).

Potentially Misidentified Species- Potamogeton richardsoni (Richardson's Pondweed) is rare in the upper Chesapeake Bay; P. perfoliatus (Redhead Pondweed; Clasping-Leaf Pondweed) is widespread (Brown and Brown 1984).


Taxonomy

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Plantae Magnoliophyta Liliopsida Najadales Potamogetonaceae Potamogeton

Synonyms

Invasion History

Chesapeake Bay Status

First Record Population Range Introduction Residency Source Region Native Region Vectors
1874 Established Stable Introduced Regular Resident Europe Eurasia Shipping(Dry Ballast), Ornamental(Aquatic Plant)

History of Spread

Potamogeton crispus (Curly Pondweed) is widespread in the Old World, in Eurasia, Africa, and Australia, but it is clearly introduced to North America (Stuckey 1979). Unconfirmed reports (probably misidentification of P. richardsoni) are recorded from North America as early as 1814, but the first definite records and herbarium specimens were collected by Tatnall (1860) from the Delaware River. Its spread was rapid: by 1900 it ranged south to James River VA and west. to Lake Erie; north to Lake Champlain and M. By 1930, it occurred in all the Great Lakes and the upper Mississippi Basin, and by 1960, in the Rocky Mountain States. There was a southward expansion in the 1930s-40s: reaching NC in 1950; FL in 1937; LA in 1949, but the southern spread was slow and spotty (Stuckey 1979).

By the 1970s, P. crispus was also found through southern Canada (Catling and Dobson 1985). Potamogeton crispus was spread both by waterfowl and by deliberate planting as a wildlife food. It was probably introduced separately to CA, in about 1900, where it spread into the Sacramento-San Joaquin system in the 1940s-1950s (Stuckey 1979). It occurs in fresh-oligohaline regions of major Atlantic estuaries from Chesapeake Bay to the St.Lawrence, including the Hudson River (Mills et al. 1997;Stuckey 1979).

Chesapeake Bay records are summarized below:

James River- Potamogeton crispus was present by 1900 (Stuckey 1979), but was not included in recent submerged aquatic vegetation surveys (Orth et al. 1993).

Potomac River- Potamogeton crispus was first collected in Alexandira VA in 1876, and was abundant by 1916 (Haramis and Carter 1983). In 1978-81, it was found only in middle portion of estuary, Maryland Point to Machadoc Creek, where it was common, but not dominant (Haramis and Carter 1983; Carter et al. 1984). It was common at oligohaline Brent Marsh, Stafford County VA (Strong and Kelloff 1994); and in a 'slightly brackish marsh', Caledon Natural Area, King George County VA (Simmons et al. 1995).

Patuxent River - Potamogeton crispus was common near Jug Bay in 1992 (Orth et al. 1993).

Upper Bay and Tributaries- Potamogeton crispus was first collected in Galena MD in streams (1877), and then at Sesputie Island (1879) (Stuckey 1979), the vicinity of Baltimore; Sollers (1888), the Chester, Sassafras Rivers, where it was abundant (Shreve et al. 1910). A specimen was collected from Herald Harbor in the Severn River in 1917 (Stieber 1967). Later, P. crispus was present but not dominant on Susquehanna Flats (Bayley et al. 1978). In 1991-1992 surveys, scattered records were found in the Northeast, Bush, and Gunpowder Falls Rivers (Orth et al. 1993).

History References - Bayley et al. 1978; Carter et al. 1984; Catling and Dobson 1985; Haramis and Carter 1983; Mills et al. 1997; Orth et al. 1993; Shreve et al. 1910; Simmons et al. 1995; Sollers 1888; Strong and Kelloff 1994; Stuckey 1979; Tatnall 1860.

Invasion Comments

Ecology

Environmental Tolerances

For SurvivalFor Reproduction
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Temperature (ºC) 0.0 25.0 18.0 25.0
Salinity (‰) 0.0 12.0 0.0 12.0
Oxygen hypoxic
pH 6.7000000000 9.8000000000
Salinity Range fresh-meso

Age and Growth

Male Female
Minimum Adult Size (mm) 300.0 300.0
Typical Adult Size (mm) 550.0 550.0
Maximum Adult Size (mm) 800.0 800.0
Maximum Longevity (yrs) 0.9 0.9
Typical Longevity (yrs 0.8 0.8

Reproduction

Start Peak End
Reproductive Season
Typical Number of Young
Per Reproductive Event
Sexuality Mode(s)
Mode(s) of Asexual
Reproduction
Fertilization Type(s)
More than One Reproduction
Event per Year
Reproductive Startegy
Egg/Seed Form

Impacts

Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay

Economic impacts of Potamogeton crispus (Curly Pondweed) are limited by the low to moderate abundance of this plant in Chesapeake Bay (Carter et al. 1984; Hurley 1990).

References- Carter et al. 1984; Hurley 1990


Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay

Economic impacts of Potamogeton crispus (Curly Pondweed) noted in inland lakes include:

Aesthetic - This plant can interfere with swimming. Its summer dieback, and decomposition can be unpleasant (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Fisheries - Moderate growth could benefit fisheries by providing cover for prey species and invertebrates. However, dense growths of P. crispus can decompose in large quantities in summer, lowering oxygen content (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Agriculture- This plant can block irrigation ditches (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Boating - This plant can restrict recreational boating (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Habitat Change- This plant has modest benefits for fisheries, and as a waterfowl food, but is considered inferior to many native species (Catling and Dobson 1985).

References- Catling and Dobson 1985


Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species

Impacts of Potamogeton crispus (Curly Pondweed) are limited by the low-moderate abundance of this plant in Chesapeake Bay. Impacts noted in inland lakes include:

Competition - Potamogeton crispus replaces native vegetation to some extent and grows above native species in spring and early summer. 'The subsequent growth of these native plants following the dieback of curly-leafed pondweed is limited'. It is considered to crowd out native species such as Potamogeton pectinatus (Sago Pondweed) in freshwater lakes (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Habitat Change - In many inland lakes, P. crispus decomposes in large quantities in summer, lowering oxygen content. It does provide cover for fishes and a substratum for aquatic invertebrates (Catling and Dobson 1985).

Food/Prey - Seeds and vegetative parts are eaten by dabbling ducks and diving ducks. It does produce seeds much earlier in the summer than other SAV (Catling and Dobson 1985). However, it is considered inferior to native plants as a waterfowl food (Hurley 1990).

References - Catling and Dobson 1985; Hurley 1990.


Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species

Impacts of Potamogeton crispus (Curly Pondweed) are limited by the low-moderate abundance of this plant in Chesapeake Bay. Possible impacts include:

Competition - Potamogeton crispus begins growing earlier in spring than other SAV, including Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrilla) and Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian Watermilfoil) (Carter et al. 1984) and could reduce the growth of these species in spring.

Habitat Change - Potamogeton crispus could provide cover for introduced as well as native fishes and also could have disproportionate importance as cover because of overwintering and early spring growth (Catling and Dobson 1985).

References- Carter et al. 1984; Catling and Dobson 1985


References

Brown, Melvin L.; Brown, Russell G. (1984) Herbaceous Plants of Maryland, , College Park. Pp.

Carter, Virginia; Gammon, Patricia T.; Bartow, Nancy C. (1984) Submersed aquatic plants of the tidal Potomac River, Geological Survey Bulletin 1543: 1-58

Carter, Virginia; Rybicki, Nancy (1986) Resurgence of submersed aquatic macrophytes in the tidal Potomac River, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, Estuaries 9: 368-375

Catling, P. M.; Dodson, I. (1985) The biology of Canadian weeds. 40. Potamogeton crispus, Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65: 665-668

Gleason, Henry A. (1963) The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada, In: (Eds.) . , New York. Pp.

Haramis, G. M.; Carter, V. (1983) Distribution of submersed aquatic macrophytes in the tidal Potomac River, Aquatic Botany 15: 65-79

Hotchkiss, Neil (1967) Underwater and floating-leaved plants of the United States and Canada, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Resource Publication 44: 1-124

Hurley, Linda M. (1990) Field guide to the submersed aquatic vegetation of Chesapeake Bay., , Annapolis, MD. Pp.

Muenscher, Walter C. (1944) Aquatic plants of the United States., In: (Eds.) . , Ithaca NY. Pp.

Orth, Robert J.; Nowak, Judith F.; Anderson, Gary F.; Whiting, Jennifer R. (1993) Distribution of submerged aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1992, , Annapolis, MD. Pp.

Resource Management Inc. (1993) National list of plant species that occur in wetlands., , Minneapolis.. Pp.

Shreve, Forrest M.; Chrysler, M. A.; Blodgett, Frederck H.; Besley, F. W. (1910) The Plant Life of Maryland, , Baltmore. Pp.

Simmons, Mark P.; Ware, Donna M.; Hayden, W. John (1995) The vascular flora of the Potomac River watershed of King George County, Virginia, Castanea 60: 179-209

Sollers, Basil (1888) Check list of plants compiled for the vicinity of Baltimore., , Baltimore. Pp.

Strong, Mark T.; Kelloff, Carol L. (1994) Intertidal vascular plants of Brent Marsh, Potomac River, Stafford County, Virginia, Castanea 59: 354-366

Stuckey, Ronald L. (1979) Distributional history of Potamogeton crispus (curly pondweed) in North America, Bartonia 46: 22-42

Tatnall, E. (1860) Catalogue of the phenogamous and filicoid plants of Newcastle County, Delaware., , Wilmington DE. Pp.

Tobiessen, Peter; Snow, Phillip D. (1984) Temperature and light effects on the growth of Potamogeton crispus in Collins Lake, New York State, Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 2822-2826

United States Army Corps of Engineers (1977) Chesapeake Bay Future Conditions Report, , Baltimore. Pp.

Wehrmeister, John R.; Stuckey, Ronald L. (1992) Life history of Potamogeton crispus, The Michigan Botanist 31: 3-16


Direct questions and comments to chesnemo@si.edu.

©